Supreme Court of Missouri· 9/22/1992

State v. Ervin

Citations

835 S.W.2d 905
1992 WL 168800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

court did not abuse its discretion in overruling continuance motion where public defender’s office had been appointed for over seven months and second appointed counsel had more than a month to prepare for the hearing
the scope of abandonment will not be extended beyond the two-part criteria mentioned above
the testimony of a single witness can be sufficient to make a submissible case
no Sixth Amendment right to counsel at Rule 29.07(b)(4) examination
trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a separate hearing on defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence where defendant did not show “whether these items were later objected to by trial counsel” or “whether a separate hearing had any chance of success”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Holstein, Thomas, Rendlen, Blackmar, Covington, Benton, Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

199 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Ervin

81 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.