New Mexico Court of Appeals· 12/1/2001
State v. Ervin
Citations
- 2002 NMCA 012
- 131 N.M. 640
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[o]n the other hand, without prejudice, there is no reversible error”
- “[W]ithout prejudice, there is no reversible 18 error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fry, Pickard, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-11-16· cited 307×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-09-06· cited 171×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-09-03· cited 85×
- State v. WareNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 66×
- State v. FawcettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-05-18· cited 65×
- State v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-02-05· cited 51×
- State v. MartinezNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 41×
- State v. RiggsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-09-02· cited 37×
- March v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 30×
- State in Interest of KAWSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-10-20· cited 30×
- Dilbeck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-08-23· cited 20×
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-05-07· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.