Supreme Court of Missouri· 2/25/2014

Price v. State

Citations

422 S.W.3d 292
2014 WL 712956
2014 Mo. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that review of a motion court’s decision regarding an abandonment motion is governed by the standard set forth in Rule 29.15(k)
holding that “Rule 29.15(e) deals only with appointed counsel and amended motions”
clarifying, once again, the Supreme Court of Missouri's unwillingness to extend the abandonment doctrine beyond the actions of appointed counsel and amended post-conviction motions
equating abandonment by appointed counsel as “tantamount to a failure of the motion court to appoint counsel under Rule 29.15(e) in the first instance.”
affirming the complete waiver of a movant’s claims from his initial motion because the abandonment doctrine exists to only cure the untimely filing of amended motions by appointed counsel
“Rule 29.15(e) ... provides that counsel will be appointed for all indigent inmates if, but only after, the inmate files his initial motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breckenridge, Draper, Fischer, Russell, Stith, Teitelman, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

125 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.