Cage v. Louisiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury instruction permitting a conviction on proof less than beyond a reasonable doubt violates due process
• holding that the terms \grave\ and \substantial\ suggest a higher degree of doubt than that actually required to acquit
• holding that the terms `grave' and `substantial' suggest a higher degree of doubt than that actually required to acquit
• holding that the terms `grave' and `substantial' suggest a higher degree of doubt than that actually required to acquit
• holding that the terms ‘grave’ and ‘substantial’ suggest a higher degree of doubt than that actually required to acquit
• holding that the terms “grave” and “substantial” suggest a higher degree of doubt than that actually required to acquit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).