Skip to main content

State v. Ervin

Citations

  • 110 N.E.3d 554
  • 2018 Ohio 1359

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in resentencing appellant on two counts of complicity to felonious assault, as the trial court retained jurisdiction to correct a void sentence. Appellant did not have a reasonable, legitimate expectation of finality in the originally imposed void sentence and correction of the void sentence did not violate principles of double jeopardy.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.