State v. Roll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing, Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 748, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 1469, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970
• “The appellant alleges nothing in his motion nor points us on appeal to anything in the record that would rebut the presumption that the trial court here knew and applied the law in convicting him.”
• to show prejudice in a guilty plea case, the movant must prove that, but for the errors of counsel, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial
• to show prejudice in a guilty plea case, the movant must prove that, but for the errors of counsel, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial
• \This Court presumes that the trial judge knew and followed the law[.]\
• “Since there was no objection, review is discretionary for plain error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).