Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/19/2006

State v. Douglas

Citations

632 S.E.2d 845
369 S.C. 424
2006 S.C. LEXIS 215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

appellate courts will not set aside convictions due to insubstantial errors not affecting the result
\An abuse of discretion occurs when the conclusions of the trial court either lack evidentiary support or are controlled by an error of law.\
\An abuse of discretion occurs when the conclusions of the trial court either lack evidentiary support or are controlled by an error of law.\
\An abuse of discretion occurs when the conclusions of the trial court either lack evidentiary support or are controlled by an error of law.\
\An abuse of discretion occurs when the conclusions of the trial court either lack evidentiary support or are controlled by an error of law.\
the admission or exclusion of evidence is a matter addressed to the trial court’s sound discretion and its ruling will not be disturbed in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion accompanied by probable prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.