Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/31/1992
Arnold v. State
Citations
- 420 S.E.2d 834
- 309 S.C. 157
- 1992 S.C. LEXIS 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an erroneous malice charge did not contribute to the verdict where \[b]ased upon all the evidence presented . . . no rational juror could have failed to find malice\
- amendments must conform to evidence presented at trial, not raise new claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PaganSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 319×
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-13· cited 287×
- Matthews v. EvattFourth Circuit· 1997-01-28· cited 234×
- Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-07-24· cited 152×
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-10-03· cited 110×
- State v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 102×
- State v. KromahSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-01-23· cited 94×
- State v. BelcherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-10-12· cited 80×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-08-20· cited 79×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-27· cited 73×
- John D. Arnold v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1997-05-14· cited 69×
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-17· cited 63×
- Truesdale v. MooreFourth Circuit· 1998-04-29· cited 63×
- State v. MizzellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-04-29· cited 62×
- State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-06· cited 58×
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-02-26· cited 48×
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-07-17· cited 46×
- State v. JefferiesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-05· cited 45×
- Drayton v. EvattSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-05-10· cited 41×
- State v. LivermanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 39×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court· 1982-04-19· cited 1,321×
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court· 1988-05-23· cited 1,283×
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 932×
- Yates v. AikenSupreme Court· 1988-01-12· cited 185×
- State v. PlathSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-01-17· cited 85×
- Aice v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 71×
- State v. PlathSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-07· cited 60×
- Arnold v. South Carolina; And Plath v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 31×
- Baxley v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 17×
- United States v. MortonSupreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 13×
- Arnold v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1988-01-19· cited 9×
- Plath v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1988-01-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.