Skip to main content

State v. Gillian

Citations

  • 646 S.E.2d 872
  • 373 S.C. 601
  • 2007 S.C. LEXIS 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding prior bad act evidence must be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice
  • holding admission or exclusion of evidence is a matter within the trial court's sound discretion, to be disturbed only upon a showing of a manifest abuse of discretion accompanied by probable prejudice
  • finding that the admission of the specifics of the defendant's prior bad act in violation of Rule 403, SCRE, was harmless because the defendant's guilt was proven by other competent evidence \such that no other rational conclusion can be reached\
  • finding the determination of prejudicial effect will vary from case to case and must be based on the entire record
  • finding an unnecessary amount of evidence admitted is considered harmless when the defendant's \guilt has been proven by competent evidence such that no other rational conclusion can be reached\
  • explaining a Rule 403 \determination of the prejudicial effect of the evidence must be based on the entire record and the result will generally turn on the facts of each case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Gillian

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.