Supreme Court of South Carolina· 9/26/2018
State v. Cartwright
Citations
- 819 S.E.2d 756
- 425 S.C. 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the independent expert did not improperly bolster the victims' credibility because she never testified she believed the victims; rather, her testimony generally explained the potential reasons why children recant and the behaviors common to sexually abused children
- precluding the trial court from providing a limiting instruction or otherwise commenting to the jury on suicide-attempt evidence
- ruling a trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of the defendant's attempted suicide because \a clear and unmistakable nexus link[ed] the suicide attempt to a guilty conscience derivative of the offence for which the defendant [was] on trial\
- finding the independent expert's testimony was not improper bolstering because she testified in general terms and \never interviewed the victims and never stated she believed the victims were telling the truth\
- stating \the trial court shall not provide a limiting instruction or otherwise comment to the jury on\ suicide-attempt evidence because such a charge may be an improper charge on the facts
- finding a defendant's attempted suicide may be admitted to prove consciousness of guilt if the evidence survives a Rule 403 analysis and establishes a nexus between the suicide attempt and a guilty conscience derivative of the offense for which the defendant is on trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-07-31
- Pantovich v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
- Chappell v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-12-11
- State v. ReyesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-12-16
- State v. AckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-01-05
- State v. Zantravious Randell HallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-06-01
- State v. Rakeem Jereal Jordan WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-08-03
- State v. Stewart Jerome MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-03-22
- State v. Stewart Jerome MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-09-20
- State v. Nyquan T. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2024-07-17
- State v. Barry W. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2026-06-10
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Charles Stephenson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-04-23· cited 437×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 122×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 119×
- State v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 102×
- State v. MannSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-06-15· cited 70×
- State v. WeaverlingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-25· cited 60×
- State v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-02-04· cited 60×
- State v. GillianSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-11· cited 52×
- State v. LangleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-22· cited 48×
- State v. StukesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-05-04· cited 39×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-09-20· cited 21×
- State v. CoudotteNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1897-11-08· cited 20×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-06-01· cited 19×
- State v. OnoratoSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-10-17· cited 14×
- State v. OrozcoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-03-02· cited 13×
- State v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-03-23· cited 10×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-20· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.