Skip to main content

State v. Robinson

Citations

  • 828 S.E.2d 203
  • 426 S.C. 579

Syllabus

The Court affirms the court of appeals as modified, holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in evaluating the Colf factors as it did and in concluding Robinson's prior convictions were admissible under Rule 609(a)(1) of the South Carolina Rules of Evidence.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by weighing the similarity factor in favor of admission because robbery \involve[s] different conduct than burglary\
  • \The purpose of the impeachment is not to show the witness is a bad person but rather to show background facts which impact the witness's credibility.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.