Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/6/1974
State v. Frank
Citations
- 205 S.E.2d 827
- 262 S.C. 526
- 1974 S.C. LEXIS 350
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding warrantless search of automobile was proper where officer had strong reasons to believe that the automobile was being used in criminal activity and that it very probably contained stolen goods
- The general rule is that the failure to object to, or failure to move to strike, testimony renders such competent and accordingly entitled to be considered to the extent it is relevant.
- evidence that goods were stolen in Greenwood County and were in locked automobile which defendant had recently purchased in Greenwood County and had then driven to Abbeville County supported inference goods were received in Greenwood County
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bussey, Moss, Lewis, Brailsford, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 102×
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-11· cited 71×
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-11-03· cited 58×
- Bannister v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 21×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-09-07· cited 14×
- State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-07-22· cited 9×
- People v. CortezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-05-18· cited 7×
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-19· cited 6×
- State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-17· cited 3×
- State v. BarronSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-03-09· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Leon v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1920-04-28· cited 27×
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-03-28· cited 24×
- State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-05-06· cited 6×
- State v. McRaeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-01-11· cited 5×
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-11-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.