Skip to main content

State v. Frank

Citations

  • 205 S.E.2d 827
  • 262 S.C. 526
  • 1974 S.C. LEXIS 350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding warrantless search of automobile was proper where officer had strong reasons to believe that the automobile was being used in criminal activity and that it very probably contained stolen goods
  • “The general rule is that the failure to object to, or failure to move to strike, testimony renders such competent and accordingly entitled to be considered to the extent it is relevant.”
  • evidence that goods were stolen in Greenwood County and were in locked automobile which defendant had recently purchased in Greenwood County and had then driven to Abbeville County supported inference goods were received in Greenwood County

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bussey, Moss, Lewis, Brailsford, Littlejohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.