Skip to main content

State v. Doe

Citations

  • 948 P.2d 166
  • 130 Idaho 811
  • 1997 Ida. App. LEXIS 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that objective test applied to in custody determination for Miranda purposes, “but with additional elements ... including ... the presence of a parent or other supportive adult”
  • holding that it was “unlikely that any ten-year-old would feel free to simply leave” when questioned by an SRO or school authorities
  • holding that it was “unlikely that any ten-year-old would feel free to simply leave” when questioned by an SRO or school authorities
  • fifth-grade student summoned and interviewed by school resource officer in faculty room of school was “in custody” for purposes of Miranda
  • juvenile was in custody when “[n]o parent or other adult concerned with Doe’s best interest was present during the questioning”
  • juvenile was in custody when “[n]o parent or other adult concerned with Doe’s best interest was present during the questioning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Walters, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.