Idaho Court of Appeals· 12/21/1999

State v. Thurman

Citations

996 P.2d 309
134 Idaho 90
1999 Ida. App. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that wildlife is “a resource to be preserved, protected, perpetuated and managed . . . ”
holding Article I, § 17 of the Idaho Constitution provides no greater 2 protection in these situations than does the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
declining to hold that Idaho’s Constitution provides greater protection to the hunting public in wildlife checkpoint stops than does the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
“[F]ish and game violations are matters of grave public concern which justify minimal intrusion into the public’s right of privacy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartzman, Perry, Lansing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.