Idaho Supreme Court· 1/27/2010

State v. James

Citations

225 P.3d 1169
148 Idaho 574
2010 Ida. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant was not in custody although officer had probable cause
concluding that “the threat of lawful arrest alone does not transform non-custodial questioning into the functional equivalent of arrest” when the officer threatened to arrest all the occupants of the car if none admitted possession of the drugs
“We join the vast majority of courts that have considered the issue and hold that the burden of showing custody rests on the defendant seeking to exclude evidence based on a failure to administer Miranda warnings.”
‘We join the vast majority of courts that have considered the issue and hold that the burden of showing custody rests on the defendant seeking to exclude evidence based on a failure to administer Miranda warnings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Eismann, Burdick, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.