Skip to main content

State v. Craig

Citations

  • 176 N.E.3d 395
  • 2021 Ohio 2790

Syllabus

Appellant's convictions for engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity and aggravated theft are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's convictions for money laundering are not supported by sufficient evidence, where the state failed to demonstrate that appellant's purchase of investment real estate with stolen funds was made with the purpose to promote, manage, establish, or carry on corrupt activity.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.