Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/26/2022
State v. Craig
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2976
Syllabus
Where the claims of appellant were either barred by res judicata or provided no substantive grounds for relief, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying postconviction relief. R.C. 2953.21.
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 773×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. SzefcykOhio Supreme Court· 1996-11-13· cited 645×
- State v. NicholasOhio Supreme Court· 1993-06-16· cited 256×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-02-08· cited 12×
- State v. CraigOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.