Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/8/2024
State v. Farris
Citations
- 238 N.E.3d 168
- 2024 Ohio 868
Syllabus
Osowik - Trial court did err in denying motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds. The convictions were supported by sufficient evidence. Claimed prosecutorial misconduct statements during closing arguments were not outcome altering. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. Earley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-11-10· cited 146×
- State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-14· cited 48×
- State v. KamerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-17· cited 21×
- State v. SearfossOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-08· cited 8×
- State v. NickelsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-27· cited 5×
- State v. CraigOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-13· cited 5×
- State v. RuetzOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-10· cited 4×
- State v. MottOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.