Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 6/11/1997

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 79 Ohio St. 3d 1
  • 679 N.E.2d 646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Ohio law is clear that evidence of flight from the scene of a crime may be considered as some evidence of guilt\
  • “It is improper for an attorney to express his or her personal belief or opinion as to the credibility of a witness or as to the guilt of the accused.”
  • “Even a cursory review of the record demonstrates that the trial judge repeatedly warned Boynton throughout the proceedings, both before and during trial, that he would be removed from the courtroom if he continued his disruptive behavior.”
  • “[I]t is universally recognized that an accused’s flight, escape from custody, resistance to arrest, concealment, assumption of a false name, and the like are admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt, and thus of guilt itself.”
  • “It is today universally conceded that the fact of an accused’s flight, escape from custody, resistance to arrest, concealment, assumption of a false name, and related conduct, are admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt, and thus of guilt itself.”
  • applying the plain error standard to a prosecutorial misconduct claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

195 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.