· 2/6/1981
United States v. John R. Dorr and John Grant Passmore
Citations
- 636 F.2d 117
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- improper argument may have affected jury’s perception of credibility question, which lay at the “very crux” of their decision
- “The sole purpose of closing argument is to assist the jury in analyzing, evaluating and applying the evidence.”
- improper statements in closing arguments
- improper statements in closing arguments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goldberg, Garza, Tate
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.