Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/10/2018
State v. Burnham
Citations
- 412 P.3d 1233
- 289 Or. App. 783
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a warrant for searching multiple electronic devices was overbroad in the context of an illegal hunting investigation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garrett, Lagesen, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TurayOregon Supreme Court· 2023-06-15· cited 34×
- State v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-02· cited 18×
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-06· cited 10×
- State v. TurayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-08· cited 6×
- State v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-20· cited 6×
- State v. DiMolfettoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-06· cited 6×
- State v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-23· cited 4×
- State v. FrischmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-19· cited 1×
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 84×
- State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-02-20· cited 48×
- State v. SargentOregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 40×
- State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court· 2006-11-24· cited 18×
- State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-17· cited 15×
- State v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-09-07· cited 11×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-15· cited 10×
- State v. VermaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-18· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.