Johnson v. Collins Entertainment Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that sections 32-1-10 & and -20 do not preclude plaintiffs from recovering gambling losses under other remedies provided by law, including SCUTPA
• noting that sections 32-1-10 & and -20 do not preclude plaintiffs from recovering gambling losses under other remedies provided by law, including SCUTPA
• noting that sections 32– 1–10 & and –20 do not preclude plaintiffs from recovering gambling losses under other remedies provided by law, including SCUTPA
• noting that sections 32-1-10 and -20 promote a policy of limiting excessive and/or unlawful gambling
• noting that sections 32-1-10 and -20 promote a policy of limiting excessive and/or unlawful gambling
• addressing various certified questions from district court relating to special inducements and cash payouts by video poker operators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).