Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 456 S.E.2d 442
  • 318 S.C. 194
  • 1995 S.C. App. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a two-day discrepancy in the chain of custody regarding the dates an investigator turned in drug evidence to the evidence custodian did not establish the drugs were inadmissible
  • holding a two-day discrepancy in the chain of custody regarding the dates an investigator turned in drug evidence to the evidence custodian did not establish the drugs were inadmissible
  • holding a two-day discrepancy in the chain of custody regarding the dates an investigator turned in drug evidence to the evidence custodian did not establish the drugs were inadmissible
  • upholding the admission of drug evidence where a discrepancy existed as to the dates of possession of persons in the chain of custody
  • noting the discrepancy in the dates pertaining to the chain of custody went to the credibility of the evidence, not its admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Shaw, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.