Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/9/1980
State v. Crenshaw
Citations
- 266 S.E.2d 61
- 274 S.C. 475
- 1980 S.C. LEXIS 347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating \[n]o single criterion is dispositive and not all the criteria are necessary to find that an individual is a public [official]\
- \No single criteria is conclusive; neither is it necessary that all the characteristics of an officer or officers be present.\
- where indictment referred to specific bribery code section on its face and there was lengthy discussion concerning that code section throughout the trial, defendants obviously knew for what crime they were being prosecuted
- where indictment referred to specific bribery code section on its face and there was lengthy discussion concerning that code section throughout the trial, defendants obviously knew for what crime they were being prosecuted
- a city police officer is a public official under the common law analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joseph R. Moss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. J. Murray Hooker, IIFourth Circuit· 1988-03-10· cited 132×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-06· cited 90×
- Holtzscheiter v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-09-22· cited 75×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-27· cited 73×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 72×
- State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 72×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-12-12· cited 52×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-02-22· cited 49×
- Holmgren v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-04-25· cited 30×
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 25×
- State v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-04· cited 22×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-21· cited 22×
- State v. BridgersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-12-29· cited 21×
- State v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-19· cited 19×
- State v. PEE DEE NEWS COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-15· cited 12×
- State v. HuntleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-03-06· cited 11×
- State v. MichauSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 8×
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-16· cited 8×
- State v. McCloudCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 4×
- Introini v. South Carolina National GuardD. South Carolina· 1993-07-29· cited 4×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State Ex Rel. Carson v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1970-07-17· cited 75×
- Livingston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1946-01-14· cited 37×
- State v. SolomonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-04-12· cited 33×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-09-22· cited 10×
- Solomon v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1966-01-17· cited 8×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-10-31· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.