Skip to main content
· 1/4/2000

Caprood v. State

Citations

  • 525 S.E.2d 514
  • 338 S.C. 103
  • 2000 S.C. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing where the appealing party does not challenge a ruling, it becomes the law of the case and will not be considered by this Court
  • finding statements made regarding unrelated crimes not hearsay where “officers were explaining their actions in pursuing the defendants and the statements were not offered for their truth”
  • stating this Court gives great deference to the PCR court's findings of fact and conclusions of law
  • stating “officers’ statements ... were similar to those in Brown in that ... the officers were explaining their actions ... and the statements were not offered for their truth”
  • the findings of the PCR court will be upheld when there is any evidence of probative value to support them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.