Skip to main content

State v. Bradley

Citations

  • 253 Or. App. 277
  • 290 P.3d 827
  • 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[t]he notice requirement is not satisfied merely by providing copies of reports and stating * * * that they ‘contain the particulars of statements made by [the victim] that the state intends to offer,’ and that ‘referenced statements concern an act or acts of abuse’”
  • written notice that materials provided in discovery contained the statements that the state intended to offer was insufficient
  • “Evidence is cumulative when it demonstrates the same thing as other admitted evidence.”
  • “The notice requirement is not satisfied merely by providing copies of reports and stating * * * that they ‘contain the particulars of statements made by [the declarant] that the state intends to offer.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Nakamoto, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.