State v. Iverson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing unreached assignment of error involving issue that might arise on retrial
• rejecting the argument that the defendant was not prejudiced by the fact that state’s notice was three days late on the ground that the “argument ignores the literal words of the rule, which provides that ‘[n]o statement may be admitted’ unless the 15 day notice is given”
• alleged victims’ hearsay statements significantly reinforced their trial testimony where they “came in through several witnesses and included some of the first statements that the complainants made about the alleged abuse”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Biscotti
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-16· cited 21×
• State v. Leahy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-10-22· cited 17×
• State v. Chase
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-02· cited 13×
• State v. Bradley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 13×
• State v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 12×
• State v. McKinzie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 11×
• State v. Ashkins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29· cited 9×
• Hagberg v. Coursey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-25· cited 8×
• State v. Fowler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 7×
• State v. Edblom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-05· cited 7×
• State v. Hernandez-Fabian
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 3×
• State v. Joseph
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-27· cited 2×