State v. Bradley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Febuary-, actual vindictiveness is proved where a sentencing court relies on an impermissible reason for sentence increase
• a merger claim is congruent with the scope of issues that pertain to a resentencing proceeding under ORS 138.222(5)(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hernandez-Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-09· cited 7×
• State v. Bradley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-10-28· cited 5×
• State v. Robledo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-09· cited 2×
• State v. Tate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-16· cited 1×
• State v. Sangrolla
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-12-06

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• Alabama v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
• Wasman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 595×
• State v. Partain
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-09-10· cited 26×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 14×
• State v. Bradley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 13×
• State v. Sauceda
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-28· cited 8×
• State v. Febuary
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-12· cited 7×
• State v. Clements
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-20· cited 6×
• State v. HOLLINGQUEST
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-23· cited 5×
• State v. Sierra
  Marion County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-04· cited 5×