Skip to main content
Josephine County Circuit Court, Oregon· 7/20/2016

State v. Hudson

Citations

  • 279 Or. App. 543
  • 380 P.3d 1025
  • 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that, despite arguments that the trial court had excluded evidence under OEC 403, “the fairest reading [of the record] is that, in the trial court’s view, the evidence lacked probative value. As noted, we review that conclusion for legal error.”
  • eval- uating relevance of proffered evidence in relation to the defendant’s theory of the case and the parties’ arguments
  • party challenging an evidentiary ruling must demonstrate that it was prejudiced by the ruling
  • party challenging an evidentiary ruling must demonstrate that it was prejudiced by the ruling
  • “[E]vidence is cumulative when it ‘demonstrates the same thing as other admitted evidence’ but is not cumulative ‘when it presents qualitatively different proof than other admitted evidence.’ ” (Quoting State v. Bradley, 253 Or App 277, 285, 290 P3d 827 (2012)
  • “[E]vidence is cumulative when it ‘demonstrates the same thing as other admitted evidence’ but is not cumulative ‘when it presents qualitatively different proof than other admitted evidence.’ ” (Quoting State v. Bradley, 253 Or App 277, 285, 290 P3d 827 (2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, Garrett, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.