Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/2/2011
State v. Chase
Citations
- 248 P.3d 432
- 240 Or. App. 541
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the state’s notice was insufficient because it did not describe the substance of the victim’s hearsay state- ments or how they would be offered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ortega, Sercombe, Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 13×
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 12×
- State v. AshkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29· cited 9×
- Hagberg v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-25· cited 8×
- State v. EdblomCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-05· cited 7×
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-21· cited 5×
- State v. Hernandez-FabianCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 3×
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 3×
- State v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-27· cited 2×
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-02
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-13· cited 20×
- State v. LeahyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-10-22· cited 17×
- State v. NorbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.