Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/22/2003
State v. Leahy
Citations
- 78 P.3d 132
- 190 Or. App. 147
- 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1423
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the appellate court will not speculate about how the record may have been developed further for the possible admission of evidence that was properly excluded on the grounds of hearsay
- recognizing that the appellate court will not speculate about how the record may have been developed further for the possible admission of evidence that was properly excluded on the grounds of hearsay
- recognizing that the appellate court will not speculate about how the record may have been developed further for the possible admission of evidence that was properly excluded on the grounds of hearsay
- “The notice must convey that the proponent intends to offer the statements, and the notice must identify the particular statements that the proponent seeks to introduce.”
- “the notice must identify the particular statements that the proponent seeks to introduce”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Of Washington v. Kevin Ray CaseCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-06-23· cited 30×
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-02· cited 13×
- State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 13×
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-06-14· cited 12×
- Hagberg v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-25· cited 8×
- State v. EdblomCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-05· cited 7×
- Mesta v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 7×
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-21· cited 5×
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-12-10· cited 4×
- State v. Hernandez-FabianCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 3×
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-01-27· cited 2×
- State v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-27· cited 2×
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-03-12· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court· 1993-01-22· cited 83×
- State v. RemmeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-25· cited 29×
- State v. McQuistenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-12· cited 22×
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-13· cited 20×
- State v. McKinzieCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. SauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-30· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.