Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/24/1995
State v. Portrey
Citations
- 896 P.2d 7
- 134 Or. App. 460
- 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- whether police engage in a search by examining items not “entirely visible” depends, in part, on “social and legal norms of behavior”
- police officers' exposing of \concealed personal effects\the soles of the defendant's boots left on the front porchimplicates privacy interests
- police officers’ exposing of “concealed personal effects” — the soles of the defendant’s boots left on the front porch — implicates privacy interests
- whether police engage in a search by examining items not “entirely visible” depends, in part, on “social and legal norms of behavior”
- privacy interests invaded when police picked up and examined the soles of boots left in a box on the front porch of the defendant’s apartment
- the scope of the presumptive implied consent does not permit a visitor to pick up boots on the front porch for inspection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.