Skip to main content

State v. Portrey

Citations

  • 896 P.2d 7
  • 134 Or. App. 460
  • 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether police engage in a search by examining items not “entirely visible” depends, in part, on “social and legal norms of behavior”
  • police officers' exposing of \concealed personal effects\—the soles of the defendant's boots left on the front porch—implicates privacy interests
  • police officers’ exposing of “concealed personal effects” — the soles of the defendant’s boots left on the front porch — implicates privacy interests
  • whether police engage in a search by examining items not “entirely visible” depends, in part, on “social and legal norms of behavior”
  • privacy interests invaded when police picked up and examined the soles of boots left in a box on the front porch of the defendant’s apartment
  • the scope of the presumptive implied consent does not permit a visitor to pick up boots on the front porch for inspection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.