Oregon Supreme Court· 10/8/2009

State v. Oliphant

Citations

218 P.3d 1281
347 Or. 175
2009 Ore. LEXIS 451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a uniform criminal jury instruction was “incorrect and should not be included in the instructions to the jury during the trial on remand”
concluding that a uniform criminal jury instruction was “incorrect and should not be included in the instructions to the jury during the trial on remand”
court views evidence in light most favorable to establishment of facts necessary to require giving requested instruction
the defendant has “a right to have the jury consider the circumstances surrounding the event from his own point of view”
the defendant “had a right to have the jury consider the circumstances surrounding the event from his own point of view”
given the facts and nature of the offenses, the defense of self-defense applied to some charges but not others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.