· 1/2/1957
State v. Lytchfield
Citations
- 95 S.E.2d 857
- 230 S.C. 405
- 66 A.L.R. 2d 263
- 1957 S.C. LEXIS 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding reversals of the refusal of a continuance are almost as “rare as the proverbial hens’ teeth”
- The granting or denial of a motion for continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.
- referring to appellate reversals of denial of continuance motions
- The granting or refusal of a motion for continuance is within the discretion of the trial judge and his disposition of such a motion will not be reversed on appeal unless it is shown that there was an abuse of discretion to the prejudice of appellant.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stukes, Taylor, Oxner, Legge, Moss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.