Skip to main content

Briggs v. State

Citations

  • 421 S.C. 316
  • 806 S.E.2d 713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling forensic interviewer's testimony she made the determination the child understood the difference between the truth and a lie \indirectly revealed she believed the subsequent disclosure . . . was the truth\
  • stating the witness's testimony was improper where there was no other purpose for it than to bolster the victim's credibility
  • discussing the cases in which this Court has \struggled\ to determine when this type of testimony is an improper comment on the veracity of the victim
  • explaining the general rule governing bolstering is \a witness may not give an opinion for the purpose of conveying to the jury—directly or indirectly—that she believes the victim\
  • \[A] witness may not give an opinion for the purpose of conveying to the jury . . . that [the witness] believes the victim.\
  • \[A] witness may not give an opinion for the purpose of conveying to the jury—directly or indirectly—that she believes the victim.\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Few, Hearn, James, Kittredge, Only

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.