Skip to main content

State v. Baker

Citations

  • 411 S.C. 583
  • 769 S.E.2d 860
  • 2015 S.C. LEXIS 63

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \Baker was prejudiced by the defects in the indictments\ where the indictments spanning a six-year time period gave an \expansive time frame and lack of specificity as to this time frame\ and hindered his ability to defend himself
  • quashing Baker's indictment for Lewd Act upon a Child because Baker was re-charged two weeks before trial and his new indictment spanned a six-year timeframe instead of the timeframe of his previous indictment, which included three summers only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Pleicones, Toal, Kittredge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.