State v. MARK R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The presence of third parties generally destroys the confidentiality of a communication, precluding a claim of privilege.”
• restriction on cross-examination of state’s witness for alleged motive to fabricate was not constitutional violation when per- mitted cross-examination and closing argument gave jury fair opportunity to consider facts supporting defen- dant’s theory of case
• ‘‘over the course of a cross-examination of the victim that filled more than thirty transcript pages, the trial court did permit defense counsel to inquire into numerous elements of the defendant’s fabrication theory’’
• \this court has rejected virtually identical claims on multiple occasions\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).