Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/31/2008

State v. Ashbaugh

Citations

200 P.3d 149
225 Or. App. 16
2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[A] person who knows that he or she is being investigated by a police officer during an encounter could reasonably believe that, for that reason, his or her freedom of movement has been restrained.”
“[A] person who knows that he or she is being investigated by a police officer during an encounter could reasonably believe that, for that reason, his or her freedom of movement has been restrained.”
“[T]he underlying principle is that a person who knows that he or she is being investigated by a police officer during an encounter could reasonably believe that, for that reason, his or her freedom of movement has been restrained.”
applying a Holmes type (b) inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Edmonds, Landau, Haselton, Armstrong, Wollheim, Schuman, Ortega, Rosenblum, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.