Oregon Supreme Court· 5/9/1996

State v. Dahl

Citations

915 P.2d 979
323 Or. 199
1996 Ore. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that under the Fourth Amendment and the Oregon Constitution, police are not permitted “without a warrant based on probable cause or probable cause plus exigent circumstances, to seize a person inside his house by ordering that person to emerge from his house”
to seize a person inside his home by commanding his exit would be inconsistent with well-established limits on police authority to enter home without warrant
“Whatever the meaning of‘lawful acts’ in the context of ORS 133.033, that meaning must be consonant with the state and federal constitutions.”
defendant's submission to police order, conveyed telephonically, to come out of his house with his hands up showed that he believed that his liberty had been restricted
defendant’s submission to police order, conveyed telephonically, to come out of his house with his hands up showed that he believed that his liberty had been restricted
appellant, who was ordered by police to come out of the house with his hands up, was seized while in his house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Unis, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.