Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/17/1985
State v. Smith
Citations
- 698 P.2d 973
- 73 Or. App. 287
- 298 P.2d 973
- 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2832
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[a] warrant check may become unreasonable ... if, for instance it takes an inordinately long time to complete”
- holding that the use of the defendant’s identification to check for arrest warrants transformed a mere conversation with the defendant into a stop under ORS 136.615
- holding that the use of the defendant's identification to check for arrest warrants transformed a mere conversation with the defendant into a stop under ORS 136.615
- holding that while a three- to five-minute long check for outstanding arrest warrants based on reasonable suspicion during an otherwise lawful traffic stop was appropriate, a warrant check may become unreasonable if it takes an inordinately long time to complete
- finding five-minute warrant check during stop lawful but warning that check may become unreasonable if inordinately long
- “A warrant check may become unreasonable under ORS 131.615(2) if, for instance, it takes an inordinately long time to complete.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette, Van Hoomissen Young, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court· 1994-04-25· cited 119×
- State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-31· cited 42×
- State v. SloaneSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-02-11· cited 33×
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-05-05· cited 20×
- State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-06-24· cited 18×
- State v. AuerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-20· cited 18×
- People v. BouserCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-07-20· cited 14×
- State v. BarrosHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 14×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-31· cited 13×
- Molina v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-07-13· cited 12×
- State v. Figueroa-SolorioCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-03-25· cited 11×
- State v. PenneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-09-09· cited 11×
- State v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-08· cited 10×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-10-30· cited 10×
- State v. MesenbrinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-03-13· cited 9×
- State v. LeinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-15· cited 8×
- State v. RifeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-15· cited 7×
- State v. AtkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-11-05· cited 7×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-04-12· cited 6×
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-08-10· cited 3×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-24· cited 244×
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court· 1981-02-18· cited 196×
- State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court· 1979-10-02· cited 67×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-05-08· cited 62×
- State v. SpenstCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-04-27· cited 21×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-11-07· cited 20×
- State v. CanapeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-06-02· cited 17×
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-03-05· cited 17×
- State v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-26· cited 13×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-06· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.