State v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that “the controlling inquiry” with respect to the objective component of the Holmes type (b) inquiry “is not whether every reasonable person would have so believed, but, instead, whether a reasonable person could have so believed” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-30· cited 13×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-15· cited 12×
• State v. Backstrand
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-04· cited 9×
• State v. Lantzsch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-15· cited 8×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 8×
• State v. Levias
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24· cited 3×
• State v. Maxie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-04-21· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Holmes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
• State v. Toevs
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-09-24· cited 125×
• MacPherson v. Department of Administrative Services
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 54×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-31· cited 42×
• State v. Highley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-26· cited 29×
• State v. Rider
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-28· cited 24×
• State v. Rider
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-12-29· cited 12×