State v. Astorga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the state’s inevitable-discovery argument as “built entirely on speculation” in part because defendant would have had the opportunity to dispose of the evidence before predictable procedures would have led to his seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hensley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 11×
• State v. Lantzsch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-15· cited 8×
• State v. Knapp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 5×
• State v. Maxie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-04-21· cited 1×
• State v. Dean
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-08

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Holmes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
• State v. Toevs
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-09-24· cited 125×
• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-07-24· cited 109×
• State v. Belt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 58×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-31· cited 42×
• State v. Ehret
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-02· cited 32×
• State v. Rider
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-28· cited 24×
• State v. Tyler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-13· cited 11×