Skip to main content

State v. Salvador

Citations

  • 241 P.3d 324
  • 237 Or. App. 424
  • 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Sumerlin in rejecting state’s argument “that [the] defendant’s contention [concerning the merger of certain convictions] is not reviewable on appeal, because he pleaded guilty”
  • rejecting the state’s argument that a defendant failed to preserve an argument that multiple convictions should merge because the defendant did not raise the argument until sentencing
  • Court of Appeals decided that defendant was not seized in part based on his concession “that he felt ‘100 percent’ free to leave the scene.”
  • Court of Appeals decided that defendant was not seized in part based on his concession \that he felt '100 percent' free to leave the scene.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Salvador

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.