Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/16/1993
State v. Barker
Citations
- 850 P.2d 885
- 252 Kan. 949
- 1993 Kan. LEXIS 49
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding to obtain testimony “from the handler of the dog as to the training, background, characteristics, capabilities, and behavior of the dog”
- recognizing and applying Deskins factors
- recognizing and applying Deskins factors
- checkpoint stop extended with court noting there “were further reasons for his continued detention based on the officer’s smell of alcohol on defendant’s breath”
- use of a dog to sniff the exterior of a vehicle is not a \search\ for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment
- \[A] drug dog's sniff of the exterior of a vehicle is not a search for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. EnglandTennessee Supreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 299×
- State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court· 2001-09-11· cited 250×
- State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 198×
- Jones v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2009-01-16· cited 142×
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-10· cited 95×
- United States v. Paul ShenandoahThird Circuit· 2010-02-09· cited 92×
- State v. PollmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-08· cited 91×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-06-09· cited 68×
- Pueblo v. Yip BerríosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1997-01-30· cited 68×
- State v. ScheetzMontana Supreme Court· 1997-12-05· cited 65×
- State v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-07-09· cited 59×
- Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-15· cited 49×
- State v. WardenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 30×
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-04-22· cited 28×
- Gama v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-07-22· cited 27×
- People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-05-20· cited 27×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-12-07· cited 25×
- State v. JardinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-22· cited 21×
- State v. Tam Thi Thu NguyenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-01-03· cited 20×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-01-22· cited 19×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 688×
- Jones v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 199×
- State v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-12-02· cited 149×
- United States v. Adela Morales-Zamora, United States of America v. Javier Ozuna-Fuentes and Jose Manuel Morales-DiazTenth Circuit· 1990-09-06· cited 147×
- United States v. John Manuel SolisNinth Circuit· 1976-06-02· cited 99×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-01-17· cited 85×
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. RenfrowN.D. Indiana· 1979-08-30· cited 68×
- State v. DammSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-03-02· cited 54×
- United States v. Ralph Joseph WalkerTenth Circuit· 1991-08-13· cited 43×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-05-11· cited 23×
- Davis v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-12-11· cited 16×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-02-20· cited 8×
- State v. HanesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-02-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.