Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/3/2013

State v. Johnson

Citations

297 Kan. 210
301 P.3d 287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a test taken after receiving 22 the 8-1001(k) notice \'is the product of the consent exception to the warrant requirement'\
declining to address issue not raised or fairly included in petition because whether review would have been granted on issue was speculative and the State was deprived of opportunity to challenge propriety of reviewing it
\Whether reasonable grounds exist to believe a person has been operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol is a question of law.\
\Whether reasonable grounds exist to believe a person has been operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol is a question of law.\
\Test results lawfully obtained pursuant to K.S.A. 2007 Supp. 8-1001 are admissible in court as direct evidence of a defendant's blood-alcohol content in . . . criminal prosecutions for driving under the influence.\
declining \to address the merits of the unpresented argument\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.