Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/9/1999

State v. Slater

Citations

986 P.2d 1038
267 Kan. 694
1999 Kan. LEXIS 397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that in context of reasonable suspicion analysis, tips are “favored” when informant is identified and can be held accountable for misinformation
stating that brief investigatory stops of motor vehicles are perceived as relatively minimal intrusions upon Fourth Amendment freedoms
stating that detailed information raises an inference that the informant observed the defendant personally
holding and providing cites for cases from several jurisdictions which hold that tips from unidentified informants generally are reliable when \the informant gives enough information that his or her identity may be ascertained\
holding and providing cites for cases from several jurisdictions which hold that tips from unidentified informants generally are reliable when \the informant gives enough information that his or her identity may be ascertained\
holding and providing cites for cases from several jurisdictions which hold that tips from unidentified informants generally are reliable when “the informant gives enough information that his or her identity may be ascertained”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Lockett, Allegrucci, Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.