State v. Raskie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant failed to brief hearsay exceptions and inadequate briefing led to waiver of argument
• emphasizing that defendants are responsible for ensuring the district court makes adequate findings under Freeman to permit appellate review
• remanding because the district court made inadequate findings on defendant's cruel and unusual punishment argument
• recognizing jury's role in weighing conflicting statements and determining credibility
• closing argument cannot inflame the juiy’s passions or prejudices or divert the jury from its duty to decide the case based on the evidence and controlling law
• finding additional arguments raised on appeal for why evidence was inadmissible not preserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).