Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/6/1995

State v. Ali

Citations

233 Conn. 403
660 A.2d 337
1995 Conn. LEXIS 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that challenged jury instruction on uses of out-of-court statements did not, as presented, raise constitutional claim
recognizing relevance of relocation by accused in determining whether police efforts in executing arrest warrant were reasonable
affirming the admission of expert testimony on rape syndrome, including testimony regarding rape victims’ tendency to delay reporting
upholding admission of expert testimony “regarding the general characteristics of women who delay reporting sexual assault” where expert’s “general description of characteristics that are common among” rape victims “narrowly focused on a subject not familiar to the average person”
because police had defendant's address, \[t]he jury could have concluded ... that ... the arrest could have been effectuated far sooner\
“[b]ecause the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense . . . [it] is a question of fact, for the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Callahan, Katz, Palmer, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Ali

56 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.