Connecticut Appellate Court· 11/29/2005
State v. Ali
Citations
- 886 A.2d 449
- 92 Conn. App. 427
- 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 499
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that fact that defendant took items after murder sufficiently supported felony murder conviction
- evidence of defendant’s ongoing drug problem highly probative of his intent and motive to commit burglary that resulted in murder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dranginis, Flynn, Dipentima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-10-17· cited 121×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 93×
- State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-09-14· cited 89×
- State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-15· cited 88×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-08-30· cited 74×
- Gallo v. United States Attorney's OfficeSupreme Court· 2000-04-03· cited 74×
- Brown v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 2000-04-03· cited 72×
- State v. MoodySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-04-24· cited 54×
- State v. GhereSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-26· cited 47×
- State v. BrowneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-10· cited 36×
- State v. GarySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-04-19· cited 34×
- State v. RiserConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-25· cited 20×
- State v. CookeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-14· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.