Skip to main content

State v. Ali

Citations

  • 775 N.W.2d 914
  • 2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 215
  • 2009 WL 4795672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming conviction for possession of controlled substance based on 9 circumstantial evidence consistent with the hypothesis that the appellant knew that the substance he possessed contained an illegal drug
  • interpreting Minn. Stat. § 152.025, subd. 2 (2006): “[A] person is guilty of controlled substance crime in the fifth degree if . . . the person unlawfully possesses one or more mixtures containing a controlled substance classified in schedule I, II, III, or IV.”
  • “Knowledge is customarily determined from circumstantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schellhas, Worke, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.